Tunstall v London Borough of Lambeth and another
QBMiscellaneous
20 documents · supplied by the court
- Division
- Personal Injury
- Track
- Part 7 Claim
- Filed
- 4 Nov 2019
- Last updated
- 1 May 20242 years ago
- Parties
- 3
- Documents
- 20£336.00 for the full file
Parties · 3
Claimant1
- Tunstall, Craig, SirLitigant in person
Defendant2
- Discontinued London Borough of LambethClyde and Co Claims LLP
- Governing Body of Gipsy Hill Federation 2Clyde and Co Claims LLP
Docket · 20
Full file £336.00Order by Master - Order
3 Jan 2024
Order before Master Eastman dated 03.01.24
Order by Judge - Order
29 Jun 2023
Order made by Mr Justice Soole dated 29th June 2023.
Order by Judge - Order
4 May 2023
Order approved by Mr Justice Soole dated 15th March 2023 2023 Sealed this day 4th May 2023.
Order by Master - Order
14 Sept 2022
Consent Order approved by Master Eastman on 2nd August 2022. Sealed and sent electronically via CMS to parties solicitors on 14th September 2022.
Filing - Reply
22 Feb 2022
Reply
Filing - Amended Defence and Counterclaim
22 Feb 2022
Amended Defence and Counterclaim
Order by Master - Order
1 Feb 2022
Email Order Before Deputy Master Toogood dated 18 January 2022 sealed 01 February 2022. Order provided to Claimant's Solicitor to arrange service in accordance with the Deputy Master's Direction. Alert sent to QB Judges' Listing. Kym Wagner QBML ...
Filing - Amended Defence and Counterclaim
26 Jan 2022
Amended Defence and Counterclaim
Filing - Reply and Defence to Counterclaim
22 Dec 2021
Reply and Defence to Counterclaim
Order by Master - Order
21 Jul 2021
CCMC listed for 2 hours - as per Order sealed under event id 39 (18th January 2022) - Sujen S 21/07/2021 This will now be taking place before Deputy Master Toogood via teams - SS 14/01/2022
Filing - Reply and Defence to Counterclaim
26 Mar 2021
Reply and Defence to Counterclaim
Order by Master - Order
23 Feb 2021
Order by Master Eastman dated 19.02.2021 and sld on 23.02.2021, send to A City Law Firm Limited
Order by Master - Order
23 Feb 2021
Order by Master Eastman dated 19.02.2021 and sld on 23.02.2021 to A City Law Firm Limited
Filing - Defence & Counterclaim
11 Feb 2021
Value of Defence & Counterclaim is Over £500,000 but not exceeding £1 million. A Non-Monetary aspect is present.
Filing - Amended Defence and Counterclaim
21 Dec 2020
Amended Defence and Counterclaim-Please take the sum of £10,000 from PBA 0087212 referred
Filing - Reply
24 Aug 2020
Reply
Order by Master - Order
16 Jul 2020
Order for CCMC
Filing - Defence
26 May 2020
Defence of both Defendants
Filing - Particulars of Claim
3 Mar 2020
Particulars of Claim
Filing - Claim Form (Part 7)
4 Nov 2019
Claim Form (Part 7)
Cross-references
No related case numbers recorded.
Same firms appear in
- KB-2026-LIV-000111
Greenlees v Ele Advanced Technologies Limited
16 Jul 2026
- KB-2026-MAN-000261
Dixon v Etherington and another
3 Jul 2026
- KB-2026-002384
Beane v Winter and another
23 Jun 2026
- KB-2026-002279
Danby v Carlsberg Marstons Brewing Company Limited
19 Jun 2026
- KB-2026-CDF-000078
Rowe v Power and others
15 Jun 2026
- KB-2026-001852
The Scout Association and another v Jacob
18 May 2026
- KB-2025-002252
Fox v Steve Fellows Road Haulage Services Limited and others
12 May 2026
- KB-2026-001688
Rose v Horndean Tyres Limited
7 May 2026
Record
- Alt case number
- —
- CE-File instance ID
- 302159
- First collected
- 29 Aug 2026
- Last collected
- 29 Aug 2026