Sugarich Limited v Trido Limited and another
Property, Trusts & ProbateRestrictive covenants
6 documents · supplied by the court
- Division
- Property
- Track
- Part 7 Claim
- Filed
- 12 Apr 2021
- Last updated
- 13 Feb 20243 years ago
- Parties
- 3
- Documents
- 6£100.80 for the full file
Parties · 3
Claimant1
- Sugarich LimitedCH ↗Howes Percival LLP
Defendant2
- Trido LimitedCH ↗Forsters LLP.
- JCAM Commercial Real Estate Property XVI LimitedCH ↗Forsters LLP.
Docket · 6
Full file £100.80Order by Master - Order
26 May 2022
Order MP- 25-5-22 order Posted to Howes Percival
Order by Master - Tomlin Order
11 Nov 2021
Tomlin Order of MAster Pester 10/11/21 sent to Howes Percival
Filing - Defence
14 May 2021
Defence - both defs.
Filing - Defence
14 May 2021
Defence
Filing - Claim Form (Part 7)
12 Apr 2021
Claim Form (Part 7)#
Filing - Particulars of Claim
12 Apr 2021
Particulars of Claim#
Cross-references
No related case numbers recorded.
Same firms appear in
- HT-2026-CDF-000010
Evans and another v CLS CIVIL ENGINEERING LIMITED
25 Sept 2026
- CR-2026-BHM-000474
Chapel Curve Ltd (in Liquidation)
17 Sept 2026
- PT-2026-BHM-000234
Manolete Partners Plc v Leivers and another
17 Sept 2026
- CR-2026-007052
PSART Investments Ltd
15 Sept 2026
- PT-2026-001072
Dahlman v Oxley (As Executor Of The Estate Of Richard Hedley Wilby (Deceased)) and another
14 Sept 2026
- IP-2026-000118
Modus Accountants Limited v Dovey Accountancy Services Limited and another
14 Sept 2026
- PT-2026-001042
Manolete Partners Plc v Johnston and another
9 Sept 2026
- CR-2026-006920
Poppy Rose Consultancy Limited
7 Sept 2026
Record
- Alt case number
- —
- CE-File instance ID
- 547105
- First collected
- 29 Aug 2026
- Last collected
- 29 Aug 2026